Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the flow and filling ability of endodontic materials using different test models

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020³â 45±Ç 2È£ p.11 ~ 11
Torres Fernanda Ferrari Esteves, Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria, Chavez-Andrade Gisselle Moraima, Pinto Jader Camilo, Berbert Fabio Luiz Camargo Villela, Tanomaru-Filho Mario,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Torres Fernanda Ferrari Esteves ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Chavez-Andrade Gisselle Moraima ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Pinto Jader Camilo ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Berbert Fabio Luiz Camargo Villela ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Tanomaru-Filho Mario ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry

Abstract


Objectives: This study compared the flow and filling of several retrograde filling materials using new different test models.

Materials and Methods: Glass plates were manufactured with a central cavity and 4 grooves in the horizontal and vertical directions. Grooves with the dimensions used in the previous study (1 ¡¿ 1 ¡¿ 2 mm; length, width, and height respectively) were compared with grooves measuring 1 ¡¿ 1 ¡¿ 1 and 1 ¡¿ 2 ¡¿ 1 mm. Biodentine, intermediate restorative material (IRM), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) were evaluated. Each material was placed in the central cavity, and then another glass plate and a metal weight were placed over the cement. The glass plate/material set was scanned using micro-computed tomography. Flow was calculated by linear measurements in the grooves. Central filling was calculated in the central cavity (mm3) and lateral filling was measured up to 2 mm from the central cavity.

Results: Biodentine presented the least flow and better filling than IRM when evaluated in the 1 ¡¿ 1 ¡¿ 2 model. In a comparison of the test models, MTA had the most flow in the 1 ¡¿ 1 ¡¿ 2 model. All materials had lower lateral filling when the 1 ¡¿ 1 ¡¿ 2 model was used.

Conclusions: Flow and filling were affected by the size of the test models. Higher grooves and materials with greater flow resulted in lower filling capacity. The test model measuring 1 ¡¿ 1 ¡¿ 2 mm showed a better ability to differentiate among the materials.

Å°¿öµå

Dental materials; Endodontics; Methods; X-ray microtomography

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed